Madame, Monsieur,
En Russie actuelle la persécution des gens pour des motifs politiques et/ou destinés à les déposséder de leurs entreprises au profit de fonctionnaires corrompus et leurs proches sont devenue habituelles.
Un des exemples les plus frappants d’une telle persécution accompagnée par une ouverture d’affaires pénales fabriquées contre un homme persécuté, est l’affaire d’un homme d’affaires pétersbourgeois Vitaly Arkhangelsky.
Il a réussi à quitter son pays à temps, et cela l’a sauvé d’une reproduction possible du sort de Sergey Magnitsky, tué en prison. Mais , comme dans l’histoire de Magnitsky dont les assassin cyniques ont décidé de le condamner même après sa mort, Vitaly Arkhangelsky et sa famille, dont ses trois jeunes enfants, continue de faire l’objet de vol après qu’il eut été illégalement dépossédé de tous ses biens et de son entreprise à succès en Russie et qu’il eut été forcé à partir à l’étranger afin d’éviter un emprisonnent arbitraire et des tortures.
Monday, April 16, 2012
Lev Ponomarev's letter
Dear Sirs,
Today, the persecution of people for political reasons and/or in order to despoil their business to the benefit of corrupted officials and their friends is a usual thing in Russia.
One of the examples of such persecutions, accompanied by initiation of falsified criminal cases against the victim, is the case of a St Petersburg businessman Vitaly Arkhangelsky.
He managed to flee his country at a good moment and that saved him from a possible repetition of the fate of Sargey Magnitsky who had been murdered in prison. However, in the same way as with Sergey Magnitsky whose cynical murderers decided to sentence him post-mortem, Vitaly Arkhangelsky and his family, including three young children, is still subjected to despoliation while all his assets and his flourishing business in Russia has been already unlawfully withdrawn and he has been forced to go abroad to avoid arbitrary imprisonment and torture. .
Today, the persecution of people for political reasons and/or in order to despoil their business to the benefit of corrupted officials and their friends is a usual thing in Russia.
One of the examples of such persecutions, accompanied by initiation of falsified criminal cases against the victim, is the case of a St Petersburg businessman Vitaly Arkhangelsky.
He managed to flee his country at a good moment and that saved him from a possible repetition of the fate of Sargey Magnitsky who had been murdered in prison. However, in the same way as with Sergey Magnitsky whose cynical murderers decided to sentence him post-mortem, Vitaly Arkhangelsky and his family, including three young children, is still subjected to despoliation while all his assets and his flourishing business in Russia has been already unlawfully withdrawn and he has been forced to go abroad to avoid arbitrary imprisonment and torture. .
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Matvienko – Saveyiev links
Re : Matvienko – Saveyiev links
http://www.compromat.ru/page_18920.htm© "Izvestia" (Moscou), 06.07.2006
Vladimir Kozhin, Valentina Matvienko and her son Sergey at the game
(…) earlier, the newspapers informed that Matvienko and his partners, Lukoil Eesti’s General Director Evgueny Bolshakov and Saint-Petersburg’s Bank important shareholder Alexandre Savelyev acquired an island for an investment project.(…) …
(…) now that Matvienko keeps strong positions in Smolny as well as in Kremlin, all the business which does not share the official politics is progressively leaving the city.
http://www.compromat.ru/page_18920.htm© "Izvestia" (Moscou), 06.07.2006
Vladimir Kozhin, Valentina Matvienko and her son Sergey at the game
(…) earlier, the newspapers informed that Matvienko and his partners, Lukoil Eesti’s General Director Evgueny Bolshakov and Saint-Petersburg’s Bank important shareholder Alexandre Savelyev acquired an island for an investment project.(…) …
(…) now that Matvienko keeps strong positions in Smolny as well as in Kremlin, all the business which does not share the official politics is progressively leaving the city.
Encore un de la classe réprimée des hommes d’affaires russes Affaire de Vitaly Arkhangelsky
Depuis un an, en France, une instruction pénale est menée sur les faits de l’utilisation par la Banque « Saint-Pétersbourg » de faux documents afin de tromper la justice française et obtenir par fraude des jugements contre Vitaly Arkhangelsky et sa famille.
En fait, les expertises graphologiques effectuées en Russie et en France permettent d’affirmer que Mr et Mme Arkhangelsky n’ont jamais signé les contrats de cautionnement personnel présentés par la Banque « Saint-Pétersbourg » au tribunal français.
En fait, les expertises graphologiques effectuées en Russie et en France permettent d’affirmer que Mr et Mme Arkhangelsky n’ont jamais signé les contrats de cautionnement personnel présentés par la Banque « Saint-Pétersbourg » au tribunal français.
One more representative of the repressed class of Russian entrepreneurs Vitaly Arkhangelsky case
For now one year, a criminal case is under investigation in France with regard to the use of the Bank « St Petersburg » of forged documents in order to mislead the French justice and obtain fraudulently court decisions against Vitaly Arkhangelsky and his family.
The case is that reports of expert graphologists in Russia and in France allow considering that Mr and Mrs Arkhangelsky have never signed personal guarantee agreements submitted by the Bank « St Petersburg » to the French court.
On January 19, 2011, M Arkhangelsky files a complaint with the Public Prosecutor of the Tribunal de Grande Instance (the First Instance Court of general jurisdiction) of Nice concerning the facts of use of contracts with falsified signatures and the attempts to obtain, in a fraudulent manner, court decisions to the benefit of the Bank.
The case is that reports of expert graphologists in Russia and in France allow considering that Mr and Mrs Arkhangelsky have never signed personal guarantee agreements submitted by the Bank « St Petersburg » to the French court.
On January 19, 2011, M Arkhangelsky files a complaint with the Public Prosecutor of the Tribunal de Grande Instance (the First Instance Court of general jurisdiction) of Nice concerning the facts of use of contracts with falsified signatures and the attempts to obtain, in a fraudulent manner, court decisions to the benefit of the Bank.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)